Posted by Christopher Coen on October 6, 2015
Screenshot from owner Mark Daly’s Facebook page
The new owners of an apartment complex in Boise, Idaho that gave refugee residents notice to vacate within 30 days, have apparently posted a picture of them on one of their Facebook pages overlain with a Confederate flag, in response to others who used rainbow flags in support of gay marriage. The apartment complex gave the refugee tenants very short-term notices to vacate in a very tight rental market, with vacancy rates as low as anybody can remember. Phone calls and letters to the owners from the mayor’s office and media have not been returned. An article in The Idaho Statesman explains the disturbing situation:
BOISE • Mayor Dave Bieter said he hopes to persuade the new owners of a Bench apartment complex that houses refugees to soften their insistence that tenants vacate the premises early this month.
Bieter said Wednesday that he has tried to call Glenbrook Apartments owners Mark E. and Caran Daly of Eagle several times without success and plans to keep trying.
“I’m attempting to contact them and ask them to have a heart about this,” he told the Idaho Statesman.
About 400 residents live in the complex…Most are refugees…
Bieter said that is too little time for tenants to find new housing in a rental market whose vacancy rates are “as low as anybody can remember.”… “We’re asking they work as best as they can to give as much time as possible.”…
Several advocates tied… unwillingness to offer flexibility to the vacating tenants to a Confederate flag appearing on Mark E. Daly’s Facebook page.
A photo of the Dalys was posted on the page June 29, with the flag overlain as a filter. The posting was in response to other Facebook users using rainbow filters to support the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage.
“I really wanted to be part of the in crowd and put one of those cool rainbow flag images superimposed over my profile picture,” the post said. “Somewhere along the line, I think I hit the wrong button, though.”
The post received one comment, from Caran Daly’s account: “Love it!”
Bill Brown, an Episcopal priest, said that if the post was a joke, it was tasteless.
“At the very least, it shows a lack of sensitivity on their part,” Brown said. “This thing at Glenbrook certainly shows a lack of sensitivity to the lives of the people they are impacting in this mass nonrenewal.”
Julianne Donnelly Tzul, executive director of the International Rescue Committee of Boise, said…“It’s a shame Mr. Daly would champion such a divisive and hurtful symbol,” she said. “It does not represent the welcoming communities we work with here in Idaho.”… Read more here
Posted in housing, right-wing | Tagged: Bench apartment complex, Boise, Caran Daly, Confederate flag, Idaho, immigration, Mark E Daly, refugees, resettlement | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on September 19, 2015
Hundreds of refugees in Boise found eviction notices on their apartment doors. The owner of the apartment complex where they live has sold the complex, with the new owner planning to do a remodel and redesign, and then put it back on the market at higher rates. Eviction notices order the refugees to move out within 30 days. With Boise’s very low vacancy rate of about 1.4 percent and only about three weeks to go, the refugee resettlement agencies – IRC, World Relief, and Agency for New Americans – are scrambling to find new homes for the refugees. An article and video report is found at KTVB-7 in Boise:
BOISE — Hundreds of people in Boise will have to find new homes, and many of those people are refugees. An apartment complex is evicting them, before a remodel and redesign. But, some people are trying to help.
The Glenbrook Apartments…in Boise is home to more than 100 families, many of them refugees. One week ago, 112 apartments got eviction notices on their doors, telling the people who live there that they have 30 days to get out.
[Julianne Donnelly Tzul, the executive director of the International Rescue Committee in Boise] says the complex was recently sold, and the new owner is remodeling and redesigning the complex, putting it back on the market at higher rates. …many of these people were on month-to-month agreements, which means they now have one month to find another place to live. Tzul says she’d like the new owner to let people stay until they found new homes. We reached out to the new owner about that possibility, but didn’t hear back.
The I.R.C., along with World Relief, [and] the Agency for New Americans…only have about three weeks to relocate 400-some people. And, that’s a tall task.
“Boise, typically, has a very low vacancy rate. It stands at about 1.4 percent,” said Tzul. “There’s a whole lot of nervousness, dread, worry.”… Read more here
Posted in housing, IRC | Tagged: apartments, Boise, eviction, Glenbrook Apartments, Idaho, immigration, IRC, refugees, resettlement | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on August 31, 2015
A campaign in conservative Idaho is seeking to force the CSI (College of Southern Idaho) Refugee Center, refugee center in Twin Falls, to close. The adversaries are led by Rick Martin, head of the newly minted Committee to End the CSI Refugee Center in nearby Buhl, a conservative agricultural area. Martin is a widely known right-wing activist. The Center has helped to resettle several thousand refugees to Twin Falls over the past three decades and, up to now, has never experienced a sustained attack on its activities, although tensions have occasionally arisen. The Committee cites fears that new arrivals could include Syrian refugees, with possible Islamist extremists hiding among them, and is gathering signatures in an attempt to create a ballot measure to close the refugee agency. The Center’s national affiliate, USCRI, said that if such a measure was ever able to pass that USCRI could open a local office to take over, and points out that refugees will arrive one way or another to reunite with relatives already living in Twin Falls. A USCRI official says that refugees could just move there on their own, once resettled somewhere else in the US – this is known as “secondary migration.” She says that would be a waste of resources and would make it much harder for the individual to be integrated into the community. An article in the Twin Falls Times-News discusses the attack:
TWIN FALLS • A refugee center in Twin Falls isn’t likely to go away even if the College of Southern Idaho stops sponsoring its program, officials say.
A local group — the Committee to End the CSI Refugee Center — wants a measure to shutter the center on ballots by May, says the group’s leader, Rick Martin, a widely known right-wing activist. They also want to recruit candidates to run for the college’s board of trustees in November 2016 with the goal of phasing out the center.
The group submitted its measure this week to the Twin Falls County Attorney, a preliminary step before the group can begin gathering signatures to get it on the ballot.
Still, college and national refugee officials say it’s unlikely resettlement services will end in Twin Falls, regardless of what happens with the ballot measure…
Jessica Lilley, a program officer with the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, addressed the topic Tuesday during a meeting with the Magic Valley Refugee Advocates, a group formed this summer to support the local program.
“You already have a community of refugees here” with family members still oversees, she said, and the U.S. Department of State will want an agency in Twin Falls to fill the gap as the relatives of refugees resettle in the United States.
USCRI has field offices around the country and could open one in Twin Falls, Rwasama told the Times-News. Regardless of who operates the program, “refugees will be here anyway,” he said…
However unlikely the chances of Twin Falls losing a refugee program, it has happened in other communities.
When it does, Lilley said, it can lead to refugees coming to cities as “secondary migrants.” It means refugees are resettled in one city but move to join their family members in a city that no longer provides refugee services.
“It makes it much harder for the individual to be integrated into the community,” she said.
Federal money is spent to help refugees to adjust to a particular city, such as paying their first month’s rent. But if they leave shortly after, it’s a waste of resources, Lilley said… Read more here
Posted in College of Southern Idaho, Idaho, right-wing, secondary migration, security/terrorism, Twin Falls, USCRI | Tagged: College of Southern Idaho, conservatives activists, CSI College of Southern Idaho, Idaho, immigration, refugees, resettlement, Rick Martin, secondary migration, Twin Falls | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on August 15, 2015
US Rep. Brian Babin, R-Texas, has introduced the Resettlement Accountability National Security Act (HR 3314), which would require an “immediate suspension [of the US] refugee resettlement program, until the Government Accountability Office (GAO) completes a thorough examination of its costs on federal, state and local governments.” The bill targeting refugees resettled legally in the US apparently reveals a larger anti-immigration stance for Babin, who over the years has only cited stopping illegal immigration as one of his main priorities. “…[Babin cited] immigration reform as the second biggest issue….[saying] that citizens across [his] district are tired of going to work every day, sweating to eek out a living and pay their bills, and then seeing illegals getting benefits from these hard working taxpayers, who get none.” (See the Immigration Chronicles blog that covered the 2014 Primary). Babin’s response appears designed only to appease an angry part of the electorate. There is no indication that he investigated the issue to determine if people’s assumptions were based in facts, or based on assumptions and ignorance. FACT: Only American citizens and some legal immigrants can get government assistance. Children of undocumented immigrants can get benefits if they are legal permanent residents or citizens (American-born children get automatic citizenship).
In an article and newscast covering Babin’s new bill, News Channel 10 in Amarillo, Texas claims that according to US government reports, a “surge” of nearly 500,000 refugees have come to the U.S. under the resettlement program since President Obama took office. Yet, looking at the raw data reveals that only 454,070 refugees have been admitted to the US since Obama took office, at an average yearly rate of 67,000. That compares to an average yearly rate of 81,145 for Pres. Reagan, 118,899 for Pres. Bush Sr., 99,202 for Pres. Clinton (see ORR Annual Reports to Congress FY1980-2004, and admissions totals at FY2005-2015). Under Pres. George W. Bush the annual rate bottomed out at 47,517 over eight years due to the 9-11 terrorist attacks and a necessity for a new rigorous background and security check system. This bottle-necked the refugee processing system for years, which still has not fully recovered. FACT: There hasn’t been a “surge” (a misapplied military term that the political Right uses) since the Pres. Bush Sr. administration — coming in at a yearly average of 118,899 refugees per year. Here is an excerpt from The News Channel 10 article:
Amarillo, TX – A bill to halt refugees resettling in the United States could substantially affect Amarillo taxpayers.
Amarillo has the highest number of refugees in the country per capita, and according to one Texas representative, if this number increases, taxpayers will feel the burden.
Since President Obama took office, government reports show nearly 500,000 new immigrants have come to the U.S. under the resettlement program…
Because of the surge, Texas U.S. Representative, Brian Babin, has introduced legislation that would halt the resettlement of United-Nations certified refugees in the U.S. pending a full evaluation on the program’s impact on the nation’s economy and national security… Read more here
Posted in Amarillo, Congress, legislation, Obama administration, right-wing, Texas | Tagged: Amarillo, bill, Brian Babin, Congress, immigration, refugees, resettlement | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on August 1, 2015
A recent newspaper article from Iowa finally gives the most complete explanation for the high rate of suicide among Bhutanese refugees (Lhotshampa). These refugees have the highest suicide rate in the country (including refugees and every other group in the US), with 20 self-inflicted deaths per 100,000 people (this blog began addressing this issue five years ago, here-1, here-2, here-3, and here-4). Now, Parangkush Subedi, a health policy analyst from the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), explains that much of this goes beyond past traumatic experiences, language, isolation, the great difficulty of adjusting to a new culture, and trying to find and maintain employment. Subedi says that the Bhutanese refugees are also deeply influenced by their culture. They believe they must also fight evil spirits, satisfy the lurking souls of the ancestors, and contend with ancient Hindu or Buddhist beliefs about fate — preordained karma. This belief tells them that their problems are a form of punishment; creating a heavy burden of guilt and hopelessness. All these factors combined lead to a large percentage of this refugee group having undiagnosed mental illnesses, chiefly severe depression. To address this issue Subedi urges Bhutanese refugee community members to set aside the stigma, talk about it and ask for help from a doctor, refugee coordinator, teacher or suicide hotline. Subedi asks that the larger Bhutanese refugee community increase its outreach to community members, and that community members listen without judging. He also recommends music, yoga, dance activities, and most importantly, sharing stories of hope so refugees who are struggling are aware that others in their position have succeeded. The article is found in the Des Moines Register:
Sorrow can feel overwhelming if you’ve lost someone, can’t find a job or pay your bills. But imagine also being uprooted from all that’s familiar, not speaking the language or understanding the customs, and being home-bound. Then, to round out the challenges, you have to fight evil spirits, satisfy the lurking souls of the ancestors, and contend with preordained karma…
…the U.N. High Commission for Refugees in 2007 began relocating [Bhutanese refugees] on a permanent basis. America has taken in 75,000 Bhutanese refugees since then. But with 20 self-inflicted deaths per 100,000 people,they have the highest suicide rate in the country.
So suicide prevention commanded center stage at a national gathering in West Des Moines over the weekend of the Association of Bhutanese in America. A health policy analyst from the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) urged community members to set aside the stigma, talk about it and ask for help.
More than one in five Bhutanese refugees nationwide is depressed, but according to Parangkush Subedi of ORR, they may not know what that means. Some develop physical symptoms, like panic attacks, stress or gastrointestinal disorders. But many are [also] deeply influenced by ancient Hindu or Buddhist beliefs about fate, and think that if they can’t find a job or make the rent, it’s a form of punishment. Add in traumatic life circumstances and, Subedi told the gathering in Nepali, “They feel they have no alternative to suicide.”…
Depression is the most common mental illness in America, affecting more than one in four adults. Certain triggering factors like job loss or family conflict can bring it on in most of us. And people of any background may abuse substances in response. But refugees have also been separated from the extended family networks they leaned on, and from their places of worship. Less able to navigate society than even their school-age children, parents see their roles shifting from heads of household to burdens. They feel shame and stigma. Their children, increasingly integrated into this new society, start to pull away. Other refugee populations have had similar experiences, but Subedi said the Bhutanese are particularly emotional, and many experienced trauma in the refugee camps. Those who suffered gender-based violence are especially vulnerable…
…in the end we’re all looking for the same basic things: Meaning, connectedness, a way to express ourselves. Forging community may be the best antidote to sorrow… Read more here
Posted in community/cultural orientation, cultural adjustment, employment/jobs for refugees, language, mental health, Nepali Bhutanese, ORR | Tagged: bhutanese, immigration, karma, Lhotshampa, mental health, refugees, resettlement, suicide | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on July 25, 2015
While some evangelicals are saying that they must be wary of anti-immigrant sentiment due to its exploitation for political gain, others continue to scaremonger their congregants, claiming that the small number of high-profile terror attacks by Muslims who came here as refugees is a good enough reason to deny entry to the tens of thousands of Muslim refugees who settle here, running from terrorists, and who seek a return to living peaceful lives. Alex Mandes, director of The Immigration Alliance, a pro-refugee and immigration group of evangelical churches and ministries said, “To hear [Franklin Graham, head of Samaritans Purse and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association] espouse [stopping all immigration of Muslims to the US] saddens me because I would hope a man who speaks for the church would speak for the gospel and not give political rhetoric that we hear.…My biggest hurt is that the church has no better answer than that? We have the great commission and the great commandment. Migration has always been a tool that God has used to bring people to himself.” An article in Christianity Today explains the issue:
…“We are under attack by Muslims at home and abroad,” Franklin Graham, head of Samaritans Purse and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, wrote on his public Facebook page on July 17. “We should stop all immigration of Muslims to the US until this threat with Islam has been settled.” At press time, more than 167,000 people had “liked” the post.
Graham’s comments came one day after 24-year-old Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, born in Kuwait and living in Chattanooga, Tennessee, shot seven people, killing five, outside a military recruiting office. Police killed Abdulazeez in an exchange of gunfire a short time later. All five of those killed were US servicemen.
Evangelicals for Biblical Immigration, which advocates for cutbacks on immigration, echoed Graham’s concerns…
But [Jenny Yang, vice president of advocacy and policy at World Relief] says those comments could backfire and lead to policy changes that hurt Christians fleeing persecution.
“My fear is that if we say, ‘Muslim refugees shouldn’t come in,’ then it will probably be harder for Christian refugees to come in,” Yang said….
Christian groups that assist refugees have run into challenges from anti-refugee sentiment at the grassroots, driven in part by other recent fatal assaults by radicalized Muslims:
- The April 2013 Boston Marathon bombing that killed 3 and injured 264.
- The June 2014 killing of two gay men Seattle.
- The September 2014 beheading of a woman in Moore, Oklahoma.
Muslim immigrants have also been targets of violence. Earlier this year, three young students—Deah Shaddy Barakat, Yusor Mohammad Abu-Salha, Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha—were gunned down in their North Carolina apartment…
Alex Mandes, director of The Immigration Alliance, a pro-refugee and immigration group of evangelical churches and ministries, said evangelicals should be wary of anti-immigrant sentiment, which can be exploited for political gain.
He said he was disappointed to hear Graham’s comments…. Read more here
Posted in evangelical, Islamic, security/terrorism, World Relief | Tagged: Alex Mandes, evangelical, Franklin Graham, immigration, Muslim, refugees, resettlement, terrorism, The Immigration Alliance | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on July 18, 2015
An article in The Guardian newspaper reports that the “US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) [from 2009 to 2014] violated agency rules and repatriated 93% of unaccompanied children under age 14 from Mexico and Canada without documenting how they decided that the children would be safe when they return to their home countries,” according to a recent US Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit. Although many of our government agencies violate rules, policies, and even laws on a regular basis, the CBP is in my opinion one the worst rogue agencies in the US federal government, known for abusing children and paying employees overtime not to work, among other illegalities. The agency regularly acts with impunity (this blog’s interaction with the CBP demonstrated that they would do anything to thwart, or at least delay, a Freedom of Information Act request; see here). Jennifer Podkul, a senior program officer for the Migrant Rights and Justice program at the Women’s Refugee Commission, says that, “the part that is illegal is not that they have not been [documenting that the children would be safe if returned], the part that’s illegal is that they have not been adequately screening [the children] according to the law.” According to the article, “While children under 14 from most countries go before a judge to have their safety determined, Mexican and Canadian children are exempt from this rule and are instead asked a set of questions by a border patrol officer or agent…Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, border agents [must] try to assess whether the child is a victim of trafficking, could become a victim of trafficking, has a fear of persecution and is competent to make decisions about their situation.” The GAO report indicates that there is almost no documentation that the CBP was completing this process. “The GAO’s analysis of 180 cases from 2014 led it to estimate that none of the 15,531 forms for unaccompanied Mexican children from fiscal year 2014 included documentation of how they determined a child’s ability to make an independent decision.” “Michael Tan, an attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said that, ‘It’s common sense that in order for CBP to meet its obligation under law, it has to be reporting what its agents are doing. And of course, [that they aren’t] makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to hold them accountable to what Congress requires them to do.’” Read excerpts from the article below:
US border patrol agents violated agency rules in deporting thousands of unaccompanied immigrant children from 2009 to 2014, according to a federal audit released this week.
The US Government Accountability Office audit said that US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) repatriated 93% of unaccompanied children under age 14 from Mexico and Canada without documenting how they decided that the children would be safe when they return to their home countries…
The GAO report was released on Tuesday, the same day that Immigrations and Customs Enforcement said it had released about 200 Central Americans in just over a week as it sped up the interview process used to determine whether those people would be in danger if repatriated. Advocates like Human Rights First say asylum seekers should generally not be held in detention centers…
The screening process used to determine whether Mexican children could be endangered by being repatriated has been a long-held concern for immigration rights groups….
“CBP just does not have the training, the understanding of humanitarian protection, to make the assessment of these children from Mexico before sending them back to their home countries,” said Greg Chen, director of advocacy at the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Chen said that the AILA’s primary concern is that the existing law assumes that an unaccompanied child can give a sufficient response to the questions while at a border patrol station, where they have likely been for a short time, and could be hungry, dehydrated and cold. “Can that child actually tell an agent, realistically, that he or she is afraid – and answer those questions well?” Chen said… Read more here
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on July 9, 2015
Emily Conrad, who “works in communications for an international textile firm in Spartanburg, S.C.”, is a “Phi Beta Kappa Wofford College graduate [and] founder of book blog, Global Book Challenge”, and has written a piece for Fitnews discussing the politicization of refugees’ plight in Spartanburg, S.C. by republican politicians and tea party activists. She points to the ugliness of, “a political system which is politicizing the unimaginable pain and suffering experienced by these refugees.” She describes these politicians as, “creating yet another politically insecure and potentially socially hostile environment for some of the weakest members of our global society; individuals who have experienced the most evil manifestations of humanity.” U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy, the politician who has come out most vocally about refugees resettling in Spartanburg, wrote a public letter in early April claiming he was, “deeply concerned about the lack of notice, information, and consultation afforded to me and my constituents about this issue.” Yet, as a reader pointed out in a letter in the The Spartanburg Herald-Journal, she had been at a meeting in August 2014 about the possibility of World Relief opening an office in Spartanburg to resettle refugees, and that U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy had sent an official representative from his office to attend to the meeting. She expressed her disappointed with Gowdy’s efforts to play politics with the issue, and asked that he explain the discrepancy between his public letter and the actions of his local office. Below is Emily Conrad’s op-ed piece:
I’d like to tell you about a country where 5.4 million people are estimated to have died since 1998 – a number of almost “Holocaustic” proportions. The bloody conflict responsible for so many causalities may surprise some…
[It is] the Democratic Republic of the Congo, formerly known as Zaire. A vast country in the middle of Sub-Saharan Africa, the Congo has long attracted the attention of westerners: King Leopold of Belgium made the extraction of the country’s resources the source of his personal wealth. Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness was written following his travels in the country…
The Democratic Republic of the Congo also happens to be the country of origin for the first two refugees who have been recently resettled to Spartanburg, S.C. (with the support of faith-based organization World Relief and local churches). These are the refugees whose entrance has caused so much ruckus and rabble-rousing from elected officials, most notably U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy…
I want to communicate my profound disappointment in a political system which is politicizing the unimaginable pain and suffering experienced by these refugees. The politicians who have decided to question and cast doubts on the individuals entering our community are creating yet another politically insecure and potentially socially hostile environment for some of the weakest members of our global society; individuals who have experienced the most evil manifestations of humanity…
While Gowdy’s so-called “scrutiny” of this refugee resettlement community might seem to be a non-issue at first, it comes at a high moral cost – undermining the very foundational pillars of our country. As we look back on our own personal family trees and our ancestors who immigrated to the United States, we see countless narratives of political and/or religious refugees…
The United States has provided a stable home, full of limitless opportunities, to generations of refugees and their descendants. To deny this same home to generations of new refugees and their descendants is to deny our own history…
It is time to stop making the refugees entering Spartanburg a political issue and instead start making it an issue based on people…I hope that Spartanburg residents (and Representative Gowdy) will come to recognize these incoming refugees as deserving and worthy of our compassion and generosity… Read more here
Posted in Congolese, right-wing, South Carolina, unwelcoming communities, World Relief | Tagged: Congo, immigration, refugees, resettlement, South Carolina, Spartanburg, Trey Gowdy | 2 Comments »
Posted by Christopher Coen on July 1, 2015
Once again the state of California is denying services to eligible refugees. In April there was the case of improperly denying SSI benefits to a disabled refugee; part of a larger pattern of wrongful SSI denials that fly in the face of the law of refugee eligibility for disability benefits. It has now become clear that California is also denying health care coverage to unaccompanied refugee minors. An article and video at KALW Local Public Radio in San Francisco tells the story:
…[Nor] Kathem was born in Iraq in 1995. In 2003, the United States invaded Iraq and his family was forced to go to Jordan and then Syria. In 2011, the Arab Spring erupted and his family was displaced again. This time, they ended up in America. Kathem was just 16…
But at home [in the US] things weren’t easy. “My mother had PTSD, ADHD, and she had many other symptoms,” he says.
Like his mother, he also struggled to adjust, “I had many problems,” he says. “I couldn’t understand the culture, I didn’t understand the people, I didn’t understand the language, I had a lot of frustrations, in public and at home.”
After less than a year in the country, Kathem’s mother kicked him out of the house. At age 16, Katham became a foster youth through the Unaccompanied Refugee Minors program, or URM.
Nationwide, there are about 1300 unaccompanied minors in the URM program…
Katham had chronic problems from his childhood on the run. Not the mental pain his mother faced, but physical ailments: a broken write, back pain, and hamstring problems. Some of his teeth were rotting from a lack of early dental care.
“My dentist told me beforehand that if I don’t find an orthodontist, I would lose four of my teeth,”…And then I looked for some orthodontist that would cover Medi-Cal, but my Medi-Cal was off.”
As an unaccompanied refugee minor, Katham is entitled to coverage through the state’s Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal. He was supposed to be covered until age 26, but when he turned 18 he lost his coverage with no explanation.
Katham says he found himself in a tight spot, but he found an orthodontist who would accept out-of-pocket payments for braces…
Katham was not the only URM being dropped from Medi-Cal earlier than promised.
“We noticed was that increasingly we were seeing the same clients over and over again with the same issues,”
says Marina Pantchenko, an attorney at Bay Area Legal Aid. She says URM’s are being denied Medi-Cal coverage they are entitled to.
Pantchenko says this kind of experience is traumatic. “Really quite horrific for a [ten] entering this country and not being able to access health care coverage”…
Pantchenko says so far she has seen 10 young people who are being denied health care. But she believes it’s just the tip of the iceberg… Read more here
Posted in California, children, health, SSI, teenagers, unaccompanied minors | Tagged: California, immigration, Medi-Cal, Medicaid, refugees, resettlement, SSI, unaccompanied refugee minors, urm | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Christopher Coen on June 25, 2015
News headlines keep informing us about violent Muslim extremists launching attacks in the US. A very few have arrived here as refugees, with the remaining 99.99…% of Muslim refugees posing to threat to this country. Law enforcement, however, rank right-wing extremists — including radical Christianists, white supremacists and far-right militia groups — as the greatest threat. Ironically, at the same time, the political right is trying to incite fear and hatred of Muslims in general. An article in the New York Times describes the main internal terrorist threat the U.S. is facing:
THIS month, the headlines were about a Muslim man in Boston who was accused of threatening police officers with a knife. Last month, two Muslims attacked an anti-Islamic conference in Garland, Tex. The month before, a Muslim man was charged with plotting to drive a truck bomb onto a military installation in Kansas. If you keep up with the news, you know that a small but steady stream of American Muslims, radicalized by overseas extremists, are engaging in violence here in the United States.
But headlines can mislead. The main terrorist threat in the United States is not from violent Muslim extremists, but from right-wing extremists. Just ask the police.
In a survey we conducted with the Police Executive Research Forum last year of 382 law enforcement agencies, 74 percent reported anti-government extremism as one of the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction; 39 percent listed extremism connected with Al Qaeda or like-minded terrorist organizations. And only 3 percent identified the threat from Muslim extremists as severe, compared with 7 percent for anti-government and other forms of extremism.
The self-proclaimed Islamic State’s efforts to radicalize American Muslims, which began just after the survey ended, may have increased threat perceptions somewhat, but not by much, as we found in follow-up interviews over the past year with counterterrorism specialists at 19 law enforcement agencies. These officers, selected from urban and rural areas around the country, said that radicalization from the Middle East was a concern, but not as dangerous as radicalization among right-wing extremists… Read more here
Posted in Islamic, police, right-wing, safety | Tagged: extremists, immigration, jihadist, Muslim, police, refugees, resettlement, right-wing, terror, Terrorists | Leave a Comment »