Friends of Refugees

A U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program Watchdog Group

Archive for the ‘Catholic Charities of Washington DC’ Category

LIRS’ affiliate Lutheran Social Services of North Dakota advises community about Jamestown refugees

Posted by Christopher Coen on July 2, 2010

Darci Asche, the community liason for Lutheran Social Services of North Dakota (LSSND), advised the Jamestown, ND community about what their reactions should be to incoming refugees, here.

Representatives from local agencies and businesses attended an informational session Wednesday to learn about Somali culture and how best to serve those people here.

Meet in the middle, was the advice Darci Asche said is most helpful. Asche is the community support services supervisor for Lutheran Social Services in Fargo. Several refugee groups reside in Fargo, including a group from Somalia. Both cultures should attempt to give and take, she said.

In Fargo, for example, employers allowed for prayer time during the business day. Muslims are required to pray five times a day and one of them is at about 1:30 p.m. Also, employers allowed for long gloves and other uniform adjustments at businesses where loose clothing like shawls and headdresses could pose a hazard. Muslim women are required to cover most of their body including wrists and ankles.

Adjustments like those are part of the challenge of migration, Asche said, but the benefits include more taxpayers, new businesses, new employees, more children in schools with declining enrollment and more residents offset the population loss in cities where populations are declining.

“My philosophy is the more diverse, the more exciting a place is,” Asche said. About 15,000 people reside in Jamestown and of them, more than 96 percent are white, according to census data from 2000.

…So far, about 30 Somalis have moved here, but about 400 have applied for housing since March, said Dave Klein of the Stutsman County Housing Authority. Many of them may have applied for housing in several cities, but the influx has created a waiting list for available residences in Jamestown, Klein said. Local people seeking housing come first, Klein said, but the housing authority also seeks to help refugees.

“We’re here to help and find ways to encourage people to be here in Jamestown,” he said.

Some local people may express concern about tax dollars benefiting refugees because some of them need housing assistance, Medicaid or other social services. But for Asche, no American immigrant started without help. The benefits of an employed new citizen outweigh the tax burden. Plus, benefits in this state are limited, she said.

“If anyone were looking for a free ride, North Dakota would not be the place to go,” she said.

Dave Klein of the Stutsman County Housing Authority says that local people are first in line for housing assistance, but his statement is a bit misleading because refugees living in Jamestown are local people.

Darci Asche of LSSND makes the sweeping claim that no American immigrant started life here without help, but government welfare programs are certainly relatively new compared to our long history of immigration. I know that my own ancestors were poor farmers and miners who received almost nothing upon their arrival to this country. In the old days charities helped immigrants, and did so with private charitable funds. I don’t think we have to misconstrue history to advocate for refugee support.

The “limited benefits for refugees from our tax dollars in North Dakota” argument is not really honest either as most of the money is federal money. North Dakota is a net importer of federal dollars, as are most rural states, for a large assortment of welfare for the general population as well as for refugees — Medicaid, food stamps, cash assistance, HUD funds, heating assistance, WIC, etc.

It’s interesting that Asche says refugees wouldn’t come to North Dakota for a free ride because certain benefits in the state are limited, but missing here is that most refugees have no say in coming to North Dakota — LSSND and it national affiliate LIRS just places them there. Refugees who come voluntary from other states via “secondary migration” number about 165 per year, while LSSND and LIRS place about 500 per year there involuntarily (almost no one would choose to resettle In North Dakota by choice when you factor in the climate, the lack of employment and consumer protections, and the old-boy power structure evident at almost every level).

LSSND Asche’s comment on the importance of diversity apparently does not apply to their view of diversity of opinion. Our group since 2001 has called attention to their repeated and obvious neglect of their refugee clients, and each time they met us with stonewalling or hostility.

The most ironic issue brought up in this article though is that some refugee resettlement groups advocate for religious freedom in the employment place, e.g. LSSND advocates that employers accommodate Muslim workers, while other resettlement agencies like World Relief and Catholic Charities of Washington DC advocate for their right to discriminate in hiring based on religious beliefs. Which position is the U.S. refugee resettlement program advocating? There seems to be an eery silence emanating from federal government refugee program agencies.

Posted in Catholic, Catholic Charities of Washington DC, Christian, discrimination in hiring, employment/jobs for refugees, evangelical, faith-based, funding, Islamic, LIRS, Lutheran Social Services of ND, Matching Grant program, North Dakota, religion, secondary migration, refugee, Somali, World Relief | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Catholic Charities of Washington, D.C. joins World Relief in discriminating based on religious affiliation

Posted by Christopher Coen on March 16, 2010

Catholic Charities of Washington, D.C. is now joining the evangelical group World Relief in creating a new employee policy that discriminates based on religious affiliation (see here).

Meanwhile, officials with Catholic Charities of Washington, D.C., have begun requiring new employees to sign a statement promising that they will not “violate the principles or tenets” of the Catholic Church. It’s a sweeping statement – one that would allow Catholic Charities to dismiss employees for virtually any infraction of church rules, from failure to attend religious services and using artificial contraceptives to cohabitation and publicly criticizing church leaders.

The Establishment Clause of the Constitution prohibits discrimination in government-funded programs. Nevertheless, President George W. Bush issued executive orders allowing faith-based social service groups that receive public money to discriminate in their hiring practices. In addition, Federal and D.C. laws also explicitly give religious groups exemptions from bans on religiously based employment discrimination (see here).

Our position is this — while it may now be legal (by law, although not by  Constitution) to discriminate against workers based on religious affiliation, any private organization that does so does NOT belong in the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program. Their participation is purely voluntary, both by them and by the federal agencies that oversee the program. They don’t HAVE to take part in the program, and they should NOT be allowed to take part.

Why? Because their religious beliefs mean that they will ban people who are the MOST qualified from being interpreters, translators, and case workers for incoming refugees. This type of religious discrimination is incompatible with the refugee program. It also just plain violates common sence. If it violates common sence then it has no place in the national, public refugee program.

For example, why would we allow Iraqi interpreters to come into the U.S. on Special Immigrant Visa’s (SIV visas) and then let them be banned from being Arabic interpreters and translators for the other Arabic-speaking refugees simply because most of them are Muslim? Do we have hundreds if not thousands of Christian, Jewish, or other, Arabic interpreters to take their place? No. Then it makes no sence for us to allow a organization to take part in the program that is going to ban their employment. As it stands, what will happen is that Arabic-speaking refugees just won’t get essential Arabic interpretation and translation services if we allow this type of religious discrimination.

World Relief kept Iraqi SIV immigrant Saad Mohammad Ali as an interpreter volunteer in Seattle for six months before he applied to work with them. They decided that his religion was incompatible with employment — that is, receiving a paycheck — but it wasn’t incompatible with doing the work for free for six months. Does that make any sense at all? The best reason they could give for refusing to hire a non-evangelical Christian, or in this case a Muslim, was that the person might feel uncomfortable while they do their praying at staff meetings.

Something tells me these people spend far too much time in meetings and not enough time assisting refugees. Federal oversight agencies must invite World Relief and the Catholic Church (USCCB) to change their new employee policies or consider leaving the refugee program. Although they have the right to discriminate, according to laws and executive orders, they don’t HAVE to. It’s a choice, and a choice that is incompatible with this program. It’s also our choice to allow them to continue to take part in this public program.

Here is our post about World Relief refusing to hire an Arabic interpreter in Seattle simply because he is a Muslim and not an evangelical Christian.

Here is out post about World Relief requiring a volunteer to sign a “spiritual assessmen”‘ in Spokane, Washington.

Posted in Catholic Charities, Catholic Charities of Washington DC, Christian, discrimination in hiring, evangelical, Islamic, religion, USCCB, World Relief | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 84 other followers