Friends of Refugees

A U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program Watchdog Group

Archive for the ‘Greensboro’ Category

Stoppage In Security Clearances For Iraqi Refugees & SIVs Caused By New Homeland Security Software

Posted by Christopher Coen on March 23, 2012

It turns out that the year-long near stoppage in security clearances for Special Immigrant Visa applicants  (now beginning to wane) and Iraqi refugees was due in part to a software snafu at the US Department of Homeland Security. The other part of the problem that we knew about was the huge backlog of security clearance reviews caused when new requirements mandated older security clearances being redone, including those for the 58,000 Iraqi refugees already in the US. A newspaper column in the Greensboro News-Record by the founding director of the Center for New North Carolinians mentions the software issue:

Freedom.” “Security.” “Education.”

The first three volunteers wrote on the board. Our interpreter explained that they were listing the advantages of living in America. The list grew.

Then they listed the disadvantages. “Separated from family members,” “loss of culture,” “learning the language,” “loss of job skills certifications.” Then these Iraqi refugees who fled to Jordan discussed their answers.

The lesson was taught by a teacher working for the International Organization for Migration. IOM contracts with the U.S. State Department to provide cultural orientation for Iraqi refugees accepted for resettlement in America. The objective was to develop realistic expectations about America and develop analytical and networking skills in decision-making. The class was conducted in Arabic because the U.S. no longer pays for English language training.

I was leading a dozen U.S. refugee professionals and researchers from half a dozen states for the Association of Refugee Service Professionals. We were studying refugee issues. My daughter, who works with the United Nations High Commission on Refugees, had arranged meetings for us. The refugees were stuck. Though approved for resettlement, they can’t get security clearances because new software designed for the Department of Homeland Security has problemsRead more here

Posted in Dept of Homeland Security, Greensboro, IOM, Iraqi, security/terrorism, SIV (Special Immigrant Visa) immigrants | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Perdue Farms Chicken Processing Plant Recruits Refugees From Greensboro NC

Posted by Christopher Coen on January 29, 2012

The World Relief office in Greensboro has been coordinating with a Perdue Farms chicken processing plant in Rockingham that has been recruiting Myanmar and Nepali-Bhutanese refugees. An article in the Richmond County Daily Journal has more:

Employment assistants from the organization World Relief drove eight Burmese and Nepalese refugees from Greensboro on Thursday morning to apply for jobs at Perdue Farms in Rockingham.

When Townsend, Inc. chicken processing plants closed around the Triad area last summer, over 400 workers were left without jobs. According to Susie Jordan, English instructor for Perdue Farms, Perdue welcomes anyone with experience processing chicken…

…“We are employment assistance,” said World Relief Employment Assistant Sylvia Bikusa. “We help with training, learning how to fill out applications, everything they need to help them become self-sufficient…

…While in town, getting settled at their new jobs, the refugees will likely stay with friends and relatives, said Jordan. She is hoping to set up a temporary apartment for commuters to stay in during the week while they prepare to have their families relocate to Rockingham…

…“The [World Relief] office in Durham called and said they are looking for workers, too,” said Jordan… Read more here

Another WordPress blog mentions that in April 2010 there were also about 100 Myanmar refugees working at the Perdue Farms plant in Lumber Bridge — not far from Rockingham.

Posted in Burma/Myanmar, faith-based, Greensboro, Nepali Bhutanese, poultry production, Raleigh-Durham, secondary migration, refugee, World Relief | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Scandal-plagued resettlement agency gets new CEO

Posted by Christopher Coen on January 26, 2011

Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (LFS Carolinas) will be getting a new CEO according to the Salisbury Post. Ted Goins will be replacing the infamous Suzanne Gibson Wise, who oversaw the scandal-plagued agency as it lost its State Department refugee resettlement contract last year.

The Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (LFS Carolinas) Board of Trustees named Ted Goins president and chief executive officer of the agency and its subsidiaries as of Dec. 9.

Current president, Suzanne Gibson Wise, will serve as vice president until her retirement on Dec. 31.

Goins will continue to serve as president and CEO of Lutheran Services for the Aging (LSA) and see both agencies through steps towards affiliation…

…[Wise said] “I am confident Ted will continue to uphold the values of LFS as he has done for LSA.”… Read more here

I was about to write that I can’t believe Ms. Gibson-Wise would have the unmitigated gall to make such a statement, but actually I’m not surprised at all. While Gibson-Wise’s refugee clients went without cold-weather clothing and furniture and lived in apartments without heat, with doors that didn’t close, and with leaking toilets, Gibson-Wise spent the agency’s funds on company paid vehicles, wireless internet in her home, endless Blackberries, a personal commode, and a new $4000 office conference table because she didn’t like the old one. The agency had also been long non-compliant with its State Department refugee resettlement contract.

Posted in clothes, furnishings, lack of, Greensboro, Iraqi, Lutheran, Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (2), neglect | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

LFSC Greensboro “contract non-compliant” long before media involvement

Posted by Christopher Coen on June 16, 2010

We just received a State Department inspection report from April 2007 which shows that Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (LFSC) in Greensboro was already neglecting their refugee clients a year-and-a-half before they got caught by the local media (here). Previous coverage is here, here and here.

As usual the State Department’s Office of Admissions enacted no penalties whatsoever. They advised the resettlement agency’s national partners (Church World Service, and Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service) to do their own monitoring instead. This wolf-guarding-the-chicken-coop “self-monitoring”, which has proved so disastrous in the financial and oil industries as well, then led to the situation we had at the end of 2009 and early 2010 with refugees in Greensboro still being placed in dilapidated apartments, scrounging dumpsters for furniture, and wearing shorts and flip-flops in December, three months after they arrived.

According to the report LFSC Greensboro was in “partial compliance” with their State Department refugee contract documents (yes, they are federal contractors, not non-contractor “partners”). Refugees were found in poor quality housing, lacked necessary furnishings, had incomplete resettlement orientation, and there was poor case file documentation. Three of four refugee families visited were found in poor quality housing and lacked furnishings (that’s 75% of the sample). All four families did not seem to have undergone a complete orientation (100%), and three of the four could not name their case worker (75%).

A Burundian refugee man had furniture in his apartment that was in such extremely poor condition that State Department inspectors had to ask him about it.  He indicated most of it came from dumpsters. He said he asked LFSC for a mattress several times, but they ignored his request, and after two weeks he found himself a mattress in the trash and brought it home (think bed-bugs). His window was cracked, he had no idea who his LFSC case worker was, and had not received any immigration information (the requirement to tell the Department of Homeland Security when he got a new address, how to get a green card, etc.). He said he wanted to go to Georgia because LFSC wasn’t helping him (this is what is known as “secondary-migration” and resettlement agencies and stated refugee coordinators are quick to complain to the federal government that they need more money to deal with it, but look at this case for why it so often occurs).

A Liberian refugee and his son also did not know who their case worker was, and did not receive any information on immigration issues.

A Montagnard (Degar – indiginous Vietnamese) minor female refugee who arrived to join her parents was found in a poor condition two-bedroom apartment (occupied by the family prior to the minor’s arrival) which was crowded with seven family. She had to sleep on a mattress on the floor in the living-room with her parents.

Another Montagnard refugee woman with four children who arrived to join her husband did not have any heat because of dismantled baseboard heating units which emitted a bad smell (gas leak?). The family did not have adequate clothing storage and had only three chairs for six people. She also had not received any orientation from LFSC.

Is it really a surprise that this agency then continued on in its ways for another year-and-a-half before things got so out of hand that community members started complaining, and a newspaper started covering what was happening? They got caught neglecting refugees in April 2007 but there were no significant consequences. The agency would not have shut down if it had not been caught, and would probably still be abusing refugees. Suzanne Gibson-Wise, the negligent CEO of LFSC, probably just went on about her arrogant ways — buying blackberries, getting wireless internet installed at her home, sitting on her personal commode. Where are the teeth in the State Department’s inspection process? No serious consequences means nobody cares. Isn’t that obvious?

The problem is that nobody learns from these incidents. The system trashes refugees’ new lives in America, the volags continue on in their negligent ways, all the while doing little other than advocating for more public money with inadequate accountability requirements, and the government agencies continue to keep up secrecy so the American public won’t understand what the problems are.

We need change we can believe in.

Posted in beds, Burundian, Christian, clothes, community/cultural orientation, Cooperative Agreement, CWS, employment services, faith-based, funding, furnishings, lack of, Greensboro, housing, overcrowding, housing, substandard, immigration services, Liberian, Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (2), Lutheran Family Services of the Carolinas, Montagnard/Degar (indigenous mountain people), North Carolina, State Department | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas back in the headlines

Posted by Christopher Coen on April 30, 2010

Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (LFSC) has now announced that they will stop vital immigration services for refugees in Greensboro, and this is, ”exclusively a financial decision” (here). This comes on the heels of the agency announcing in late February that they would discontinue resettling refugees in Greensboro (here and here).

We spoke with a State Department official who stated that they had been aware of the series of newspaper articles late last year that revealed that refugees were not being cared for at LFSC, but she claimed that the decision to stop refugee resettlement at LFSC was made by LFSC and its national partner LIRS. So in other words, the State Department is refusing to say what their involvement was. How’s that for open and transparent government that President Obama has called on the federal agencies to carry out?

In either case, refugees are once again left hanging.

Posted in faith-based, funding, Greensboro, immigration services, Iraqi, LIRS, Lutheran Family Services of the Carolinas, neglect, North Carolina, Obama administration, State Department | 1 Comment »

Update to Lutheran Family Services fiasco in Greensboro, NC

Posted by Christopher Coen on February 25, 2010

It’s now being reported that LFS claims it didn’t have enough revenue to cover their expenditures for refugee resettlement in Greensboro (here). Yet, the State Department had just doubled the per head (per refugee) funding of LFS and other resettlement agencies retroactive to January 1, 2010.

[LFS' executive director, the Rev. Laura Benson] cited economic circumstances in Greensboro, and “the gap between our revenue and our expenditures” as the reason the office is being closed.

A major difficulty has been finding jobs for newcomers, as well as attracting donations and working with sponsors who have their own budget challenges.

If the State Department just doubled LFS’ government funding revenue, then why would there be  a shortage of revenue to cover expenditures? Did expenditures rise even faster? How would that be possible if LFS was essentially cutting back on their care of their refugee clients in Greensboro. In recent months refugees reported that LFS was not providing such required basics as used clothes, money for rent, and assistance to the refugees to look for jobs. LFS also placed the refugees in an apartment complex with dilapidated apartments, apparently because they were cheaper and saved LFS money.

The article in the Greensboro News-Record today also reports that this so-called decision by LFS to end refugee resettlement operations in Greensboro was in fact a joint decision by LFS, their national affiliate LIRS, and the State Department (also see LFS’ posted statement on this matter, here). Is that a face-saving way of saying that the State Department told LIRS to make their affiliate LFS cease resettlement in Greensboro, and LFS agreed to do so? Probably.

Certainly there is nothing new about the lack of private funding that LFS has brought to refugee resettlement in Greensboro. As I wrote in my post yesterday about this case (here), LFS’ 2008 form 990 shows that even in 2007-8 LFS was only operating on 6% private funding. How much lower could that have gone in 2009?

We call on LIRS and the State Department’s PRM to open up and explain to the public all the reasons theyhad for telling LFS to stop operations in Greensboro, and specifically to disclose all figures on revenue (both government and private sources) and expenditures just prior to this announced closure.

Posted in government, Greensboro, Iraqi, LIRS, Lutheran Family Services of the Carolinas, North Carolina, PRM, State Department | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas shuts program after media catches them neglecting refugees

Posted by Christopher Coen on February 24, 2010

Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (affiliate of LIRS), featured in a series of local newspaper articles about their neglect of refugees, has closed its doors to further refugee resettlement (here). Current refugee clients will be transitioned to other local resettlement agencies over the next four months.

Lutheran Family Services of the Carolinas halted its refugee arrivals to the Triad on Tuesday, citing economic conditions.

The announcement by the nonprofit, which has operated in the Triad since 1979, comes after a spate of problems in serving clients. “This is a financial decision driven by the current economic conditions,” stated an unsigned statement on the LFS Web site, “that have affected the program’s sustainability at this site.”

Neither the agency’s executive director, the Rev. Laura Benson, nor Chief Executive Officer Suzanne Gibson-Wise, could be reached for comment.

Existing refugee clients will be “transitioned” to other resettlement agencies in the Triad between now and June, the statement says. At that point, LFS refugee work in the Triad will cease and will be limited to Raleigh and Columbia, S.C.

“It’s going to be devastating,” Heather Scavoni, an immigration lawyer for LFS, said Tuesday. “Between Miami and here, the wealth of knowledge is concentrated in the Greensboro office.”

LFS, which contracts with the U.S. State Department to relocate refugees who are uprooted by war and political upheaval, is one of four resettlement agencies in the Triad.

The others remaining will be Church World Services, World Relief of High Point and N.C. African Services Coalition.

About one-third of all refugees coming to North Carolina come to the Triad, the state refugee coordinator has reported, because of the concentration of resettlement agencies here.

In the 1990s, LFS played the lead role in turning the city into what outside observers likened to a “little Ellis Island.”

But recently, a combination of staff turnover, scarce resources and a grim employment outlook for newcomers resulted in turmoil at the agency.

Last fall, the state refugee coordinator noted that a Burmese refugee and former LFS client who turned up at Greensboro Urban Ministry’s night shelter was the first reported homeless refugee in North Carolina.

That case was followed by months of upheaval for resettled Iraqis, whom LFS moved to apartments in the Hunters Glen complex off U.S. 29. There, some units had no heat, plumbing leaked and clients lacked proper clothing and follow-up services.

By last week, some Iraqis whom LFS resettled to Greensboro last summer had become so desperate for work that a few had signed on with a staffing company, Labor Solutions, to work at a poultry plant in Moorefield, W.Va., by arrangement with LFS.

The local agency’s director of employment services for refugees, Vicki Dithane, attended a meeting of Burmese refugees at the Kitchen Operations Center on Tuesday night but said LFS staff members themselves had not yet been informed of the announcement.

The newspaper articles detailed LFS refugee clients being severely neglected (here) (here) (here) and (here). LFS placed refugees in a dangerous apartment complex (Hunters Glen Apartments had a large number vacancies due to many code violations when LFS placed the refugees there) that had apartments without heat, with doors that didn’t close, and with leaking toilets. Refugee clients did not receive basic used clothing items, e.g. young Iraqi refugees walked around in December four months after arriving in what clothes they were able to bring from Iraq, thin jackets and flip-flops. They had to find furniture in the garbage. After only four months refugees didn’t even have enough money for rent, even though refugee cash assistance should have been good for their first eight months at least.

A former LFS employee who commented wrote the following about LFS’s Chief Executive Suzanne Gibson-Wise:

“[She sent to employees] via courier a package containing a letter of termination and a handful of forms to sign, one such form threatening them if they choose to badmouth LFS after the termination they will forfeit their right to draw unemployment. Of course this was illegal……[Your] company paid vehicles, the wireless internet in your home, your endless Blackberries, your peronal (sic) commode and your $4000.00 office conference table. (Remember, you got it because the one that was in the office when you came wasn’t good enough).”

It seems that LFS may not necessarily have closed their refugee resettlement operations in Greensboro for a lack of finances, as they claim, or how else would their Chief Executive have been able to afford all these luxuries while her refugee clients went without proper clothing and rent money just four months after their arrival?

By the way, LFS’s 2008 990 form (most recent available) shows that 94% of its funding came from the government (here). LIRS touts its affiliates’ contributions to the U.S. refugee resettlement program as the vital “private sector” contribution — this one run with 94% government funding.

Our question is this: if this is the best that a senior refugee resettlement agency can do — spending government funds on employee luxuries while seriously neglecting refugees — what does that say about the refugee resettlement agencies’ trustworthiness as partners in refugee resettlement? Also, what does it say about the State Department relying on VOLAGS to police their own affiliates?

Finally, would LFS have stopped its abuses if the media had not become involved? Would anyone — the NC state refugee coordinator, the State Department, LIRS — have stopped them without media involvement? Probably not because similar situations country all over the country.

UPDATE: February 25, 2010 (here)

Posted in Burma/Myanmar, Greensboro, Iraqi, LIRS, Lutheran Family Services of the Carolinas, North Carolina, PRM, State Department | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 85 other followers