Friends of Refugees

A U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program Watchdog Group

Archive for the ‘Montagnard/Degar (indigenous mountain people)’ Category

LFSC Greensboro “contract non-compliant” long before media involvement

Posted by Christopher Coen on June 16, 2010

We just received a State Department inspection report from April 2007 which shows that Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (LFSC) in Greensboro was already neglecting their refugee clients a year-and-a-half before they got caught by the local media (here). Previous coverage is here, here and here.

As usual the State Department’s Office of Admissions enacted no penalties whatsoever. They advised the resettlement agency’s national partners (Church World Service, and Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service) to do their own monitoring instead. This wolf-guarding-the-chicken-coop “self-monitoring”, which has proved so disastrous in the financial and oil industries as well, then led to the situation we had at the end of 2009 and early 2010 with refugees in Greensboro still being placed in dilapidated apartments, scrounging dumpsters for furniture, and wearing shorts and flip-flops in December, three months after they arrived.

According to the report LFSC Greensboro was in “partial compliance” with their State Department refugee contract documents (yes, they are federal contractors, not non-contractor “partners”). Refugees were found in poor quality housing, lacked necessary furnishings, had incomplete resettlement orientation, and there was poor case file documentation. Three of four refugee families visited were found in poor quality housing and lacked furnishings (that’s 75% of the sample). All four families did not seem to have undergone a complete orientation (100%), and three of the four could not name their case worker (75%).

A Burundian refugee man had furniture in his apartment that was in such extremely poor condition that State Department inspectors had to ask him about it.  He indicated most of it came from dumpsters. He said he asked LFSC for a mattress several times, but they ignored his request, and after two weeks he found himself a mattress in the trash and brought it home (think bed-bugs). His window was cracked, he had no idea who his LFSC case worker was, and had not received any immigration information (the requirement to tell the Department of Homeland Security when he got a new address, how to get a green card, etc.). He said he wanted to go to Georgia because LFSC wasn’t helping him (this is what is known as “secondary-migration” and resettlement agencies and stated refugee coordinators are quick to complain to the federal government that they need more money to deal with it, but look at this case for why it so often occurs).

A Liberian refugee and his son also did not know who their case worker was, and did not receive any information on immigration issues.

A Montagnard (Degar – indiginous Vietnamese) minor female refugee who arrived to join her parents was found in a poor condition two-bedroom apartment (occupied by the family prior to the minor’s arrival) which was crowded with seven family. She had to sleep on a mattress on the floor in the living-room with her parents.

Another Montagnard refugee woman with four children who arrived to join her husband did not have any heat because of dismantled baseboard heating units which emitted a bad smell (gas leak?). The family did not have adequate clothing storage and had only three chairs for six people. She also had not received any orientation from LFSC.

Is it really a surprise that this agency then continued on in its ways for another year-and-a-half before things got so out of hand that community members started complaining, and a newspaper started covering what was happening? They got caught neglecting refugees in April 2007 but there were no significant consequences. The agency would not have shut down if it had not been caught, and would probably still be abusing refugees. Suzanne Gibson-Wise, the negligent CEO of LFSC, probably just went on about her arrogant ways — buying blackberries, getting wireless internet installed at her home, sitting on her personal commode. Where are the teeth in the State Department’s inspection process? No serious consequences means nobody cares. Isn’t that obvious?

The problem is that nobody learns from these incidents. The system trashes refugees’ new lives in America, the volags continue on in their negligent ways, all the while doing little other than advocating for more public money with inadequate accountability requirements, and the government agencies continue to keep up secrecy so the American public won’t understand what the problems are.

We need change we can believe in.

Posted in beds, Burundian, Christian, clothes, community/cultural orientation, Cooperative Agreement, CWS, employment services, faith-based, funding, furnishings, lack of, Greensboro, housing, overcrowding, housing, substandard, immigration services, Liberian, Lutheran Family Services in the Carolinas (2), Lutheran Family Services of the Carolinas, Montagnard/Degar (indigenous mountain people), North Carolina, State Department | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

USCRI strikes again — this time at Raleigh field office

Posted by Christopher Coen on June 15, 2010

The U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI) has done it again. YET ANOTHER one of their offices or affiliates was found out of compliance with the bare minimum requirements of the State Department refugee contract (the Cooperative Agreement and its attachments) - this time in Raleigh, North Carolina here.

The State Department found that this USCRI field office was “non-compliant” with many aspects of the contract, including core (basic) services that were not always provided within required time frames, core services delegated to churches without a co-sponsorship agreement, and case files that were seriously deficient. In addition two of the four refugee homes (apartments) visited by the State Department inspectors were roach-infested and needed maintenance.

The State Department’s refugee office seems to grasp the concept of a representative sample of refugees, selecting refugee cases themselves from the files, or at least not allowing the contractor to select the refugee cases — in contrast to the ORR allowing resettlement contractors to hand-select refugees to speak at the Annual Consultation. I’ll give them credit for that. For this inspection of the USCRI Raleigh field office they selected four refugee cases to visit.

The first refugee case was a Burmese family — a husband, a wife, and their four-year-old daughter. They said the USCRI had placed them in an apartment without food (the Operational Guidance to Resettlement Agencies requires resettlement agencies to give the refugees food upon the their arrival). The inspectors also noticed that the case file notes indicated in one place that USCRI purchased food for the family before their arrival, and in another place indicated they purchased it after their arrival. Suspicious, they then found an altered Food Lion receipt in the file to make it seem that USCRI had purchased the food before the refugee family’s arrival. Nice try.

The second refugee case was a Burmese refugee family consisting of a husband, wife, and three young children. The wife said no one from USCRI had talked with her about employment, and that the family didn’t have beds for the adults or youngest child, nor a couch, until a week after they arrived. The family’s apartment also had second-floor windows that were in disrepair, presenting a danger to the young children. The USCRI listed a church as the responsible party for certain core services even though USCRI Raleigh does not use co-sponsors. The church was supposedly responsible for registering the school-age child for school, yet there was no notation when that had happened.

Another Burmese refugee said USCRI placed him in a heavily roach-infested apartment, with roaches crawling in every room. Again there was no food in the apartment upon arrival. He said his couch had broken springs, he had inadequate clothing storage, and the stove had broken burners.

A Montagnard (Degar – Vietamese highland people) refugee woman who arrived with her son told inspectors that USCRI Raleigh, similarly,  never gave her any help to find a job. The USCRI also assigned her to the church that was not an official co-sponsor, and later a church volunteer ruined her efforts to get Medicaid, failing to take her to the interview in the required time-period and failing to bring the proper paperwork to the interview. USCRI also visited this refugee woman a week late (since home visits are only required to be done once in the first 30 days, that means this one didn’t happen until the refugee woman had been here for over 5 weeks!).

In addition, the agency’s case files were an utter and complete mess. Two files had no case notes at all, and a third contained only one post-arrival case note. Another case file began nearly two months after the refugee’s arrival, and four others ended only one month after the refugees’ arrival, even though the core-service period is 90 days. The agency also failed to document referrals to employment assistance, ESL, and whether or not they had provided food and home furnishings.

Unbelievably there is no sign that the State Department did even its usual wrist slapping by temporarily suspending assignment of refugees to this negligent USCRI field office.

Sadly, I suppose that this type of contract-cheating and refugee neglect from the State Departments “partners” is so common that it just doesn’t seem to call for much of a response.

Posted in beds, Burma/Myanmar, churches, Cooperative Agreement, employment services, food, furnishings, lack of, household items, missing or broken, housing, substandard, Montagnard/Degar (indigenous mountain people), neglect, North Carolina, ORR, Raleigh field office, Raleigh-Durham, State Department, USCRI | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 85 other followers