Joshua Foust, a Fellow at the American Security Project and the author of Afghanistan Journal: Selections from Registan.net, writes that Jamshid Muhtorov, the Uzbek refugee from Denver who prosecutors accuse of aiding a terrorist organization, will probably not get a fair trial. Foust notes the prosecution won’t let Muhtorov’s defense know or discuss how the prosecution claims to know that Muhtorov “knew” he was going to go help an organization fight US forces. Prosecutors are holding Muhtorov on secret evidence, including witness statements, which by definition of being secret cannot be scrutinized or challenged. The prosecution also alleges, without presenting any evidence, that Muhtorov is too violent to release publicly, though they have not charged him with planning any violent attacks. Furthermore, the prosecution alleges that years of documentation showing that Muhtorov was indeed a human rights activist, including leaked State Department cables, are questionable at best because “some online articles” (a blogger’s rantings) accused Muhtorov of faking everything. (???) So, the prosecution has resorted to repeating rumors on the Internet to defame this man, rather than relying on real evidence.
Foust writes that it gives him pause when terrorism cases are built on hearsay, internet comments, crazed lunatics posting 6,000 word anger-rants, and secret evidence. He says that it should concern people that this leaves either a trial based on flimsy, circumstantial internet behavior for a pre-crime or thought-crime, or it leaves a secret, unchallengeable Soviet-style trial with secret evidence that no one can scrutinize. Foust’s analysis is found at the Registan:
The Denver Post has been following the saga of Uzbek refugee turned terror suspect Jamshid Muhtorov, since he settled in the U.S. in Aurora, a city next to Denver, Colorado (when I was doing my undergrad in Boulder, I would teach classes for the Princeton review in Aurora and Columbine, if you can believe it).
While the case itself remains under investigation — we have yet to see if the government is going to bring any non-circumstantial evidence forward — the coverage of said case, including the credulity given to the prosecution’s statements and publicly declared evidence in the press, is pretty surprising… Read more here


