Friends of Refugees

A U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program Watchdog Group

Archive for the ‘intimidation of refugees’ Category

Bhutanese intimidated, assaulted and robbed in Erie

Posted by Christopher Coen on October 3, 2011

A series of robberies, physical assaults and even a BB gun shooting have recently created fear among Bhutanese refugees resettled to Erie, Pennsylvania. Joel Tuzynski, the executive director of the Multicultural Community Resource Center has written an opinion piece in the Erie Times-News about the issue.

…Erie has been fortunate to be the new home to several hundred new arrivals of the Bhutanese Nepali community…

…Their transition from an Eastern tradition into Erie has become a very difficult journey because some of the “criminals in our midst” have seen these people as “easy marks.”

There have been a series of robberies, physical assaults and even a BB gun shooting, that have recently created fear and wondering among the Nepali regarding their new home.

These attacks upon young Nepali men and women, who are naive to the ways of the modern world, trusting of others, and non-violent by choice, are verging upon what we fear is becoming “ethnic intimidation” at this point.

Erie Mayor Joe Sinnott and Erie Police Chief Steve Franklin are trying to work with the Nepali community about reporting and solving these crimes.

…when a young man is robbed in broad daylight outside of our MCRC [Multicultural Community Resource Center] — a program that exists to welcome and assist them — it is time to call the public’s attention to this situation, which has reoccurred too often.

The physical assaults, robberies and intimidation, must stop, as it is a violation of basic civil rights guaranteed to all people under our Constitution.

We call upon our neighborhood watches, the police SWAT teams, local, state and federal officials and other concerned citizens to help us stop this targeted, criminal, uncivilized, mean-spirited, ill treatment of our newest neighbors, the Nepali community… Read more here

This case gets back to the issue of using refugees to boost the number of inhabitants of US cities with declining populations. Erie’s population was 138,440 in 1960, which declined to 101,786 in 2010. Is it ethical to use these people — as part of a humanitarian program — to boost declining population levels, when many of these places are also particularly unsafe for refugees during their vulnerable time of transition?

Posted in Catholic Charities, dangerous neighborhoods, Erie, Hindu, International Institute of Erie, intimidation of refugees, Nepali Bhutanese, police, population levels, using refugees as pawns to boost, safety | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Refugees with mental health issues suffer in public housing

Posted by Christopher Coen on August 11, 2011

Refugees with PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder) and other mental health issues struggle tremendously in the rigorous challenges of resettlement. Reporters with the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism are taking a look at the issue in that resettlement country. An article in the Reportage magazine tells more:

Over the last 3 days, the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism has documented the appalling conditions suffered by people living with mental illness in public housing in western Sydney.

Their testimonies, and those of the health workers who care for them, describe repeated harassment, victimisation and bullying by neighbours. Some have received death threats. Yet their pleas for help go unheeded by Housing NSW – who refuse to acknowledge any duty of care.

Today this special investigation looks at the plight of one especially vulnerable group – refugees. Many are suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of horrific experiences in their countries of origin.

But a study published recently in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry found that while traumatic experiences in their home country contributed to “substantial proportions” of psychological distress among refugees, their post-settlement experiences had an even greater effect on their mental health…

…There’s no shortage of research on the mental health and housing challenges faced by refugees. Yet another report from the Refugee Research Centre at the University of New South Wales, The Settlement Experiences of Refugees and Migrants from the Horn of Africa, identified housing as one of the main obstacles to the successful settlement of refugees with mental health issues…

…Yet despite a plethora of reports and research, the health and housing bureaucracies in NSW seem incapable of acknowledging there’s a problem. Read more here

Posted in Australian refugee resettlement prgm, homelessness, housing, intimidation of refugees, mental health, PTSD | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Helping refugee women navigate the health care system in Phoenix

Posted by Christopher Coen on September 8, 2010

The Refugee Women’s Health Clinic in Phoenix is the subject of an article in The Arizona Republic. The clinic set up a system to guide refugee women through each step of the process to show them how the system works, so they can learn to navigate it on their own. Refugees seem to benefit greatly from a hands-on approach to refugee resettlement, rather than a tough love approach that leaves refugees lost – an important lesson for refugee resettlement agencies.

Volunteers…are the lifeblood of the Phoenix clinic, working hands-on to guide refugees through every step of their appointments. Many of them…are refugees themselves. They understand the fears and frustrations these women feel about navigating something totally alien: the American health-care system.

The clinic has served more than 400 patients since it was opened in October 2008 by the Maricopa Integrated Health System as part of its larger women’s clinic. The clinics are funded through the county health system.

Crista Johnson, the clinic’s medical director, said she recognized the need for more hands-on involvement when patients began wandering around MIHS for hours at a time, not knowing where to pick up prescriptions or get blood work done.

The clinic, which now has five volunteers and five translators, is an important resource for Arizona’s refugees, whose population is growing as its demographics shift. There are 3,260 refugees in the state, according to the Arizona Refugee Resettlement Program. Somalis, Cubans and Sudanese historically have dominated Arizona’s refugee population, but since 2008, there has been a surge from Bhutan, Myanmar, Burundi, Iraq and Iran…

…For most refugees, scheduling an appointment is a foreign process – like everything else about their new lives here.

The ultimate goal is to empower patients to navigate the health-care process by themselves, Johnson said.

Until then, patients are guided every step, starting with a knock on the front door.

Employees at apartment complexes remind every patient of her appointment the day before and call for a taxi to pick her up on the day of the appointment.

Once the cab drops a patient off, hospital volunteers accompany her as she waits in the reception area. They help her fill out insurance paperwork and start friendly conversation.

A volunteer or an interpreter stays with every patient throughout the appointment, taking care of her other children while her temperature is taken or translating from behind a curtain in the exam room as she gets a pap smear.

Then, volunteers take every patient to pick up her prescriptions or get X-rays. Before patients leave the clinic, Nizigiyimana schedules follow-up appointments and calls for taxis to take them home.

Georgia Sepic owns and manages a Phoenix apartment complex in which 97 percent of residents are refugees. Sepic said she emphasizes the importance of routine health checkups to her residents…

…Refugee women are skeptical and fearful of authority, Nizigiyimana said, because many of them have experienced rape, torture or trauma. Volunteers like Abdalla try to minimize the patient-provider mentality by approaching the women as friends… here

I notice that at one apartment complex in Phoenix refugees make up 97 percent of the residents, which is interesting following on the heels of refugee housing segregation in Boise, in another article.

The mention that refugee women are often skeptical and fearful of authority is something that is central to refugee resettlement. Countless times I have witnessed resettlement agencies who play with refugees’ fears in order to intimidate refugees not to complain when the resettlement agencies neglect their contractual responsibilities. Another common practice is questioning refugees after they have spoken to community members who are critical of resettlement agencies. Resettlement workers will pepper refugees with questions about who they spoke to, why they spoke to that person, and what they said – sending a clear message that refugees are not to voice any of their concerns or complaints to members of the community. The refugee program should never tolerate any refugee resettlement agency that uses refugees’ fears to coerce them.

Posted in Arizona, Burma/Myanmar, Burundian, Cuban, health, intimidation of refugees, Iranian, Iraqi, Nepali Bhutanese, Phoenix, Somali, Somali Bantu, women | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

USCCB’s Catholic Diocese of Arlington Caught Neglecting Refugees, Area Churches Say Enough Is Enough

Posted by Christopher Coen on March 29, 2010

The media caught yet another refugee resettlement agency neglecting their refugee clients — USCCB’s Catholic Diocese of Arlington’s Office of Migration and Refugee Services. Area churches say enough is enough, that they will no longer allow USCCB to treat refugees inhumanely and ignore refugee program guidelines (see article).

…volunteers from Fredericksburg-area churches unrolled an elaborate welcome mat. But now, church staff and volunteers say enough is enough.

“This is a justice issue,” said the Rev. Larry Haun, pastor of Fredericksburg Baptist Church. “We don’t want to be understood as being against refugee resettlement. We just think that when they’re resettled, they should be treated according to the guidelines. They should be treated humanely.

“When people are invited here, and when they aren’t given food, when they aren’t given beds, when they aren’t given blankets, that’s injustice.”

It is also a legal issue. Resettlement agencies contract with the federal government and agree to provide beds, blankets, food or money for food, other furniture and linens.

At a meeting in late February, local church leaders asked the U.S. Department of State to stop sending refugees to the Fredericksburg area.

The refugees are invited by the State Department and resettled by the Catholic Diocese of Arlington’s Office of Migration and Refugee Services. The office’s Fredericksburg Refugee Service Center has a satellite location on Butler Road in Stafford County.

The Catholic resettlement agency, after taking an enormous amount of help from local churches and community members, apparently decided to exclude the churches and local volunteers after they started voicing concerns. Refugees said the Catholic agency workers then warned them not to talk to church volunteers about their situations or to take their help.

Newcomers arrived and volunteers did not know–until established refugees told stories of families with little furniture, food or transportation.

Volunteers from several area churches stepped in to help. But they say that they could rarely reach the resettlement office. Resettlement officials said they are protecting their clients’ privacy.

Refugees said they’ve been warned not to talk to church volunteers about their situations or to take their help.

“We tell them: ‘Don’t take free stuff. Work for what you get,’” said Derek Maxfield, associate director of the Arlington Diocese’s Migration and Refugee Services.

Don’t take free stuff?! That’s what the refugee resettlement program is all about — community members donating free stuff and time to help refugees so that the government doesn’t have to do it all alone, otherwise known as the “public/private partnership”. Hello! Apparently the Catholic agency is forgetting that is how they just convinced the State Department to double R&P funding, by claiming that they give too much free stuff and volunteer time, via churches, community groups and other volunteers, and that the government must do more (here).

The Catholic resettlement agency’s warnings to refugees not to speak to volunteers, something we have documented all over the country when we catch an agency neglecting their refugee clients (is it written in their playbook?), is nothing less than a form of intimidation and abuse of vulnerable clients.  Refugee clients should NEVER be used as pawns when refugee resettlement agencies attempt to avoid accountability. Not to mention the refugees’ constitutional right to freedom of association. They may speak to or befriend anyone they wish, despite refugee resettlement agencies treatment of them as second-class citizens.

Seyoum Berhe, director of the Archdiocese of Arlington Migration and Refugee Services, also claims that refugees only get four months of help. Not true. That’s only for refugees enrolled in ORR’s Matching Grant Program (and they can get up to six months help, if the resettlement agency will give it to them, not just four), and refugees enrolled in Matching Grant are able to apply for refugee cash assistance if they are still unemployed after four months (they can get help up to the end of their eighth month). Anyway, only 30% of refugees are in Matching Grant. Most refugees get at least eight months of help if they can’t find a job. Low income refugee families with children can get assistance even longer.

In fact, Berhe compares resettling refugees to raising teenagers. And in the resettlement program, refugees typically have four months to be self-supporting.

“We’re like tough parents,” Berhe said.

Resettlement contracts with the State Department require the basics: furnished homes, English classes and help finding jobs. Financial assistance–which comes through a few federal and state agencies–lasts only a few months.

But many volunteers say refugees require more than what the resettlement workers provide.

So then the question becomes, why did USCCB decide to resettle the particular refugees that they did in Fredericksburg? We know that the VOLAGs meet each month and decide which refugees they will take and where they will resettle them. They meet right there in Arlington at the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center (RPC). Why did USCCB decide to take Burundi and Iraqi refugees and resettle them to Fredericksburg? Is there any local torture center that can help rehabilitate the Iraqi refugees? The Burundian refugees started arriving in large numbers 4-5 years ago. We know they have greater needs than other refugees. Why did USCCB think that Fredericksburg was the right site for them?

When Arlington’s Migration and Refugee Services chose Fredericksburg for resettlement, starting-level jobs were plentiful.

Many refugees found jobs quickly and were able to afford the rents. But as the recession deepened, jobs grew scarce.

At the time, more refugees were coming, and they had greater needs.

For example, those from Burundi in central Africa had spent decades in refugee camps. They often came with little formal education and did not know how to use indoor plumbing, electricity or cars.

And some refugees from Iraq came with severe emotional scars. They needed mental health resources, something already scarce in the area.

….When the national resettlement agencies’ staff decide where to place refugees, they look at communities’ capacity.

Then there is the issue of the federal requirement that local government agencies MUST be consulted about refugee resettlement and placement issues. Is there enough local capacity? In this case the Catholic Church decided to just ignore that requirement, as we see all too often, and the State Department and the ORR apparently didn’t even care enough to enforce their own requirements — once again!

Capacity takes into account social services and nonprofits, schools, health departments and jobs.

School officials, social services directors and health department officials said they were never asked how many refugees they could handle.

Of course we just saw this problem in New Hampshire, where the state refugee coordinator claimed she couldn’t require the local resettlement agencies to coordinate with local government agencies — even though that is what the law requires! (here)

The law/regulations that govern the U.S. refugee resettlement program (45 C.F.R. PART 400—REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM, see 400.5:H) requires that local refugee resettlement agencies meet regularly with local government officials.

 “…the State will…assure that meetings are convened, not less often than quarterly, whereby representatives of local resettlement agencies, local community service agencies, and other agencies that serve refugees meet with representatives of State and local governments to plan and coordinate the appropriate placement of refugees in advance of the refugees’ arrival.”

Also, according to the State Department Cooperative Agreement contract that USCCB signed USCCB must:

“…colaborate with state and local officials, other agencies and services in the area in implementing a plan to rationalize the numbers of refugees to be resettled and to ensure quality services and a welcoming atmosphere are provided to refugees.”

So, where is Virginia’s state refugee coordinator, Kathy Cooper? She’s the director of the Virginia Office of Newcomer Services and supposedly coordinates all of this in Virginia. Now, after the resettlement agency neglected the refugees she says all sides involved in resettlement in Fredericksburg need to talk more. Yeah, but what about the required consultation with local government agencies before resettlement agencies bring refugees in and dump them off? That’s the advantage of following regulations. They tend to be there for a good reason.

The problem we have with government oversight agencies is the same problem we have with the private refugee resettlement agencies — there are no consequences for ignoring regulations and requirements. In the meantime the Congress just keeps rewarding them with more money. This is a recipe for more refugee neglect, more refugee abuse, and more negative articles in the media — something that will both damage more refugees’ lives, and damage the program even further.

See State Department 2007 monitoring. Note that in spite of their inspection and their recommendations, with no penalties imposed not much seems to have changed.

*Update — April 2, 2010 Editorial at Free Lance-Star (here)

Posted in arlington, Burundian, Catholic, Catholic Diocese of Arlington, Christian, Cooperative Agreement, faith-based, fredericksburg, funding, government, intimidation of refugees, Iraqi, local officials, failure to notify, mental health, New Hampshire, ORR, R&P, religion, RPC (Refugee Processing Center), State Department, USCCB, Virginia, volunteers | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 84 other followers