Friends of Refugees

A U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program Watchdog Group

Archive for the ‘Refugee Council USA (RCUSA)’ Category

Presidential Determination for Refugee Admissions, Fiscal Year 2011

Posted by Christopher Coen on October 9, 2010

President Obama, via the Presidential Determination for Refugee Admissions, has announced his authorization for the admission of up to 80,000 refugees to the United States during Fiscal Year (FY) 2011.

The admission of up to 80,000 refugees to the United States during Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest; provided that this number shall be understood as including persons admitted to the United States during FY 2011 with Federal refugee resettlement assistance under the Amerasian immigrant admissions program, as provided below.

The 80,000 admissions numbers shall be allocated among refugees of special humanitarian concern to the United States in accordance with the following regional allocations; provided that the number of admissions allocated to the East Asia region shall include persons admitted to the United States during FY 2011 with Federal refugee resettlement assistance under section 584 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act of 1988, as contained in section 101(e) of Public Law 100-202 (Amerasian immigrants and their family members):

Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000
East Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,000
Europe and Central Asia . . . . . . . . . . 2,000
Latin America/Caribbean. . . . . . . . . . . 5,500
Near East/South Asia. . . . . . . . . . . 35,500
Unallocated Reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000

Read more here

The total of 80,000 refugees authorized by President Obama is the same number that he authorized for last year. Refugee Council USA (RCUSA) recommended that the president authorize 100,000 refugees in 2011. RCUSA is the lobbying group for the national refugee resettlement agencies and each years recommends the entry of larger numbers of refugees, seemingly irrespective of our capacity or ability to absorb those numbers of refugees. In fact they have spent the past year announcing to anyone who will listen that there is not enough public money in the system to cover refugees’ minimum needs during their first year or so in the US, in spite of the State Department doubling the refugee resettlement per refugee grant in January. They then go ahead and recommend that we increase resettlement by 20,000? Their local affiliates simultaneously tell everyone that they have no control over the numbers of refugees entering the US.

So remember that. They have no control this year over the number of refugees entering the US. They got 20,000 fewer refugees than they wanted. I wonder what their new excuse will be now when the media continues to find them neglecting their refugee clients?

Posted in Obama administration, Refugee Council USA (RCUSA), State Department | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Refugees here facing unemployment, homelessness, so RCUSA asks for 20,000 additional next year

Posted by Melissa Sogard on June 27, 2010

The Refugee Council USA (RCUSA), the refugee resettlement agencies’ lobbying wing, is recommending to the President that we accept 100,000 refugees in fiscal year 2011, here and here. That would be 20,000 more than he recommended for this year – 80,000. Next year, no doubt, we’ll read well-placed media stories about how these additional refugees were forced onto the resettlement agencies, and how overwhelmed they are.

Unexplained is how the agencies would be able to find jobs for that many additional refugees in a down economy. According to RCUSA’s Fiscal Year 2011 Funding Urgently Needed for the Office of Refugee Resettlement: 

  … the federally funded programs administered by local refugee resettlement agencies are highly successful in assisting refugees in securing employment…

Is that true? According to the article, Arizona’s Neglected Immigrants, jobs in Phoenix are scarce for refugees:

The recession is having a strong impact on employment for Arizona’s refugees. Finding jobs for immigrants is a primary concern for the state-contracted refugee resettlement agencies, which bring a large portion of Africans to the Valley.

Only one in three of people in the refugee caseload entered the workforce in 2009, the lowest level in three years for the Office for Refugee Resettlement. Those who landed work received an average hourly wage of $7.17 here.

We know that jobs are scarce in most other states as well.

Taking at look at honey pot recommendations, RCUSA recommends more than doubling funding for the Matching Grant program from $60 million to $135 million. The program allows the resettlement agencies to give refugees donated stuff, a.k.a. ‘Junk for Jesus’, and the government matches it at a 2 to 1 ratio – two government dollars for each dollar of stuff. (Shouldn’t it be 1 to 1? The 2 to 1 is essentially a “mismatch”, isn’t it?)

They also want a $12.4 million increase for “Specialized Employment Services” for highly educated and professional refugees. But we’ve seen how they use current funding for Iraqi SIV immigrants, here. They already receive public funding for case management for each refugee whether they be refugees who are highly educated professionals or not. Why don’t they just use those dollars to connect the refugees with information at existing organizations that offer a wealth of information to help immigrant professionals, such as Upwardly Global?

RCUSA also wants $13 million more for its resettlement agency members for ‘Case Management for Highly Vulnerable Refugees’. Does that mean they are also willing to take a cut in funding for the refugees who are highly employable, well-adjusted and don’t need much case management? I suspect not.

They want an extra $4 million for community outreach. For example, the ORR funds ethnic food festivals in places like Lincoln, Nebraska here. I suspect that sort of thing is useful as a way to help refugees earn money, while creating a fun festival for the larger community, but with refugees facing evictions in the current economy is this really the best way to spend limited funds? Why isn’t current funding being shifted to help with emergencies?

Posted in employment/jobs for refugees, funding, Iraqi, Lincoln, Matching Grant program, Nebraska, Obama administration, ORR, Phoenix, Refugee Council USA (RCUSA), SIV (Special Immigrant Visa) immigrants | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 84 other followers