The Christian Century takes a stand against World Relief’s discrimination in hiring
Posted by Christopher Coen on May 17, 2010
The Christian Century has taken a stand against World Relief’s discrimination in hiring (here). World Relief recently formalized a hiring policy that prohibits the hiring of non-Christians. (See our earlier posts on this issue here, here, here, and here).
Iraqi immigrant Saad Mohammad Ali worked for six months as a volunteer with World Relief, helping the nonprofit Christian-based agency resettle Iraqi refugees in the Seattle area. Apparently he was good at his work, for his superiors at World Relief encouraged him to apply for a job as a caseworker. But then, according to the Seattle Times, the agency called to say it could not hire him after all because he is not a Christian.
Is that a clear case of religious discrimination? Or is World Relief entitled as a Christian organization to hire employees based on religious beliefs?
Before you answer that question, consider this part of the story: over 65 percent of World Relief’s budget comes from federal funds.
That fact should clinch the question. World Relief is perfectly free as a religious organization to hire only Christians. But if it receives government money, it should abide by U.S. laws against discrimination in hiring. Taxpayer money—including Mohammad Ali’s tax money—is supporting World Relief. The government has chosen to give WR funds not because WR is a Christian organization (that would be a clear violation of the First Amendment) but because it provides a social service. It is discriminatory for Mohammad Ali to be denied on religious grounds a job that the government funds and his own tax money helps support.
Unfortunately, the rules on hiring practices are murky since George W. Bush in 2007 declared that religious organizations that receive federal funds can hire on the basis of faith. Barack Obama promised to reverse that directive, but he has not made good on the promise, and his Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships has carefully sidestepped the issue.
Overturning Bush’s directive need not mean overturning the tradition of government partnerships with religious-based nonprofits like Catholic Charities or Lutheran Social Services. Those agencies have long operated out of a sense of religious mission, and they pick their top leaders and board members on the basis of commitment to that mission. But in running their everyday operations that rely on government funds—in hiring social workers or translators, for example—those agencies abide by government rules against discrimination. That basis for partnership both protects religious freedom and respects religious identity—and helps religious organizations be clear about why they are getting government dollars.
Of course World Relief has also admitted that it conducts prayer (a clear form of worship) on taxpayer-funded refugee program time — prohibited by current regulations. We wrote to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in HHS and the State Department about this violation of regulations, but they have not responded.
This entry was posted on May 17, 2010 at 12:34 am and is filed under Christian, discrimination in hiring, evangelical, faith-based, Iraqi, Islamic, public/private partnership, religion, Washington, World Relief. Tagged: catholic charities, Christian, discrimination in hiring, faith-based, federal funds, George W. Bush, Lutheran social services, Muslim, public funds, religious, World Relief. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.